Bundesgerichtshof [Federal Court of Justice of Germany], First Civil Section, ambiente.de, I ZR 251/99,

Document type
Court Decision
Country
A domain name authority is neither a direct infringer nor an aider and abettor and hence generally does not bear tortious liability for third party registrations that infringe trademarks rights of others. Obligation to cancel the domain name can be based only on the disturbance liability and arises exceptionally when the objected domain name was brought to its attention and is “unambiguously infringing” or after the court determined it to be infringing.
Country
Year
2001
Topic, claim, or defense
Other IP
Document type
Court Decision
Issuing entity
Highest Domestic/National (including State) Court
Type of service provider
DNS Provider
Issues addressed
Trigger for OSP obligations
OSP obligation considered
Account Termination
Type of law
Civil
General effect on immunity
Mixed/Neutral/Unclear
General intermediary liability model
Takedown/Act Upon Knowledge (Includes Notice and Takedown)
Takedown/Act Upon Court Order