Document type
Court Decision
Country
Rejecting the safe harbor defense of section 75 of the Electronic Communications because respondent does not fall within the definition of “service provider”, as it is instead the means to obtain access to an information service provider.
Country
Year
2003
Topic, claim, or defense
Defamation or Personality Rights
Document type
Court Decision
Issuing entity
Highest Domestic/National (including State) Court
Type of service provider
Internet Access Provider (Including Mobile)
Type of law
Civil
Criminal
General effect on immunity
Weakens Immunity